We are showing here how the facts are manipulated and a citizen harassed by lack of information, lack of transparency, non documented vague verbal transmitted accusation

And the strangest of all, the building control MA37 doesn't discover or doesn't, want to discover that the house is classified as outbuilding, not suitable for dwelling? to protect someone?

Intransparent, non-documented secrete procedures

it is an appalling example of disregard for the Rule of Law

  • some kind of denunciation takes place in 2016, (because people are envious towards our botanical garden?)
  • ochlocracy, the crowd is summoned to inspect our house and pass a verdict on us.!!! Then they have a meeting with the executive power (building control) but we are excluded.
  • some kind of inspection is carried in 2016 with the participation of the crowd.
  • no conclusions and no report are produced after the inspection
  • in 2018  some kind  remote (technically impossible to do it with the centimeter precision from the windows of the neighboring house) so called inspection is carried our to  verified if  the unknown, unlisted items from 2016 were corrected.   Typical way to introduce lack of transparency and to keep the citizen in fear, to manipulate, intimidate by not informing what is the transgression, wrongdoing. "is all this prosecutions because of my blue eyes?

 

1    MIn 2018 Mr. Cech (chief Building Control Vienna) accuses me that I have not removed items I have promised to remove after inspection 27-07-2016, What items?  Sorry i can't read the mind of  building control officials. We have never received any report and according to Mr. Cech such report was never prepared. form Mr. Cech's e-mail
     
2 After 1.5 years new harassments starts so we ask when was the report from the last inspection prepared. We ask about some kind of description, a report from the  inspection
     
3 Mr. Cech actually confirms that no formal, written report was produced after the inspection in 27-07-2016
Aha !!!  so what?, is it the way to return to the issue when someone needs it the authority to kick you out?  We have never  taken part of any negotiations.		  Mr. Cech, confirms that no report was envisaged, WHY?

We have never been allowed to take part of any negotiations.
To Mr. Cech, Why no report is prepared and no information provided
     
4 After the inspection on 27-07-2016, In a letter to the building control inspector 10-08-2016  we ask what are the result of the inspection? what is wrong, no answers.  We have no clue what could be wrong, we make wind protections lower. Maybe it is too high. we have no clue. Letter to the Building control authorities asking for a report, statement after the inspection.
page 1
page 2
     
5 Suddenly in 2018, a new pressure on us is needed, Ms. Stock (Building Control) refers to some old "undocumented" wrongdoings, never seen, probably a good memory of Ms. Stock inspired by someone (what other explanation could it be) and we are accused for not having done something we were never informed about. A typical example of violation of RULE OF LAW by  bringing some kind of old accusation after 1.5 years, all informal, all ready to use against the citizen. Well known strategy to keep people insecure in the former socialistic countries.