25-03-2018 |
Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,
Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs
Thank you for your letter on behalf of Dr. Karin Kneissl, ref
BMEIA-SE.4.13.08/0001-IV.1/2018 as an answer to my letter dated
13.02.2018
I think the issue is relevant for the BMEIA as it concerns the Rule of
Law and Human Rights in Austria, please review the examples described on
this site
www.gardenius.com The
reference to this case (thousands of similar cased resulted in Brexit)
will be used in the public and the Social Media ahead of the EU election
2019.
I am disappointed in the way the European Union protects the EU citizens
in other EU countries all seen in perspective that (I was an
enthusiastic supporter of the idea of European Union) I reported to Carl
Bildt how the political argumentation was carried out in Austria, ahead
of the national EU referendum in Sweden. (Carl Bildt was probably the
first Prime Minister in the World using E-mail, personally!!!) After
many years, experiencing, manipulation, corruption and restriction of
civic freedoms in many of the EU countries, I am convinced that the
Rule of Law and transparency are more developed in UK and in Sweden. I
plan to use my experience in the elections to the European Parliament in
2019. I have full respect for the Austrian reality but the EU has
promised us an integration of the legal systems of the Member States and
protection within the borders of the EU. Is Sweden outside of the EU,
then there is no need to use the EU standards as guiding principle, and
no reason for disappointments. My disappointment is not with the
Austrian or Italian or Spanish legal systems but with the inadequate
implementation of the EU's values and standards. The work EU intended to
do is not done as the case below illustrates. I don't want to complain
about Austria or Italy or to change Austria or Italy - I want to provide
arguments for Sweden to leave the EU in order to maintain freedoms,
transparency and the high standards in the area of Rule of Law.
|